As I began reading Dr. Andrew Huberman’s Protocols, I was struck with the following paragraph. In the Introduction chapter, no less!
“You’ll also notice from just these short few paragraphs that I eschew the whole notion of “biohacking”. A hack is a shortcut that involves leveraging something toward a typically unrelated goal, like jury-rigging a paperclip and tape to fix broken eyeglasses. Hacks are never long-term solutions.”
While Dr. Huberman’s argument is mostly semantic, it does echo a wider culture shift in the health and fitness space I’ve been tracking. So, after over a decade of biohacking, maybe it’s time for me to admit it: biohacking is dead.
Let me show you what happened (and maybe where we are headed).
The whole ‘quantified self’ movement, which predates much of what we now associate with modern health biohacking, embodied (as far as I can tell) a very similar hacker ethos that was developing in the cyber security scene in 80s and 90s. As the name implies, it was very much a data-driven approach to the human body as a system. And like all systems, this one, too, could be optimized, and you can’t improve what you can’t measure.
Hacking was never about shortcuts. It was about systems thinking and creativity.
Continue reading “Biohacking is Dead. Long Live Biohacking.”










